FOLA has been an eye-opener for me. I've loved these sessions and I hope to continue with this work for the rest of my life. —Engineer preparing for an educational role
FOLA is a graduate-level survey course, first delivered in Harvard's Mind, Brain, and Education program. It is focused on over 100 years of research and thought in the original positive psychology field—developmental psychology.
This year, as Lectica launches its first fully scalable learning & measurement tool—MindLog™—we find ourselves retracing our journey from philosophy and theory to the development of practical tools designed to support a future in which everyone has an opportunity to develop optimally.
MindLog is a sophisticated learning tool that supports mental development while creating a visual record of an individual's development in the form of a growth chart calibrated to the Lectical Scale. MindLog is the first tool of its kind.
We'd like to share this journey in the hope that what we have learned so far will help others move forward in their own lives and work. That's why we're inviting you to join us for a very special live FOLA experience—our 2nd Year of Developmental Delight.
During this special FOLA you will take part in rich discussions centered on the original FOLA Lectures and readings and newer material covering Lectica's research during the period from 2015 to 2025. As a participant, you will primarily be reading material from original scholarly sources. However, we will not focus exclusively on academics. As a group, we will be charged with the task of relating ideas in the literature to real-world educational and existential issues.
Before signing up, we suggest that you check out the syllabus below and view the first FOLA lecture (below), in which Dr. Zak Stein explores the historical and philosophical origins of developmental psychology.
We'll be meeting on the second Saturday of each month from August 9, 2025 to July 11, 2025.
The primary meetings will be held from 5:00 PM–7:00 PM New York Time.
The fee for participation in our Year of Developmental Delight is $2,449 in US funds. The proceeds from all Institute activities are used to fund Lectica's non-profit activities.
If you think you'd like to join us, please complete our registration form. (If you have questions, please contact us. We'll get right back to you with answers.)
I feel like for the first time in a long time, I've entered a true learning community and I'm going to continue to build on that, to pay that forward into the organization where I work. —Human Development VP
FOLA explores the developmental theory and research that underpin Lectica's learning model, assessments, and learning tools. It includes 11 hour-long recorded lectures (view sample) that were delivered by Drs. Zak Stein and Dr. Theo Dawson during the fall of 2014 at Harvard's Graduate School of Education. It also includes a 12th lecture in which Dr. Dawson recaps Lectica's evolution and brings us up to date. Through engagement with these lectures and selected readings, you will explore the pedagogical implications of a wide range of developmental theories, the research spawned by these theories, and their real-world implications.
FOLA is available in the following forms:
FOLA is required if you plan to use our data in your thesis or if one of us is sitting on your doctoral committee.
FOLA lectures are divided into three parts—history, concepts, and applications. In the historical review, we examine the origins of developmental psychology, tracing the evolution of key ideas across over a century of research and theorizing. In the second part, in which we focus on concepts, we review the state of contemporary theory and research, exploring key concepts that form the basis of our research and assessments. Finally, we shift our focus to applications, discussing the ways in which developmental maieutics (including the Lectical® Assessment System) has been used in research and in efforts to foster radical innovations in standardized testing and education. In every lecture, we consider at least one concrete educational application of the ideas and research findings that are the focus of that lecture.
Module 1: James Mark Baldwin and the origins of development psychology
Module 2: Piaget, genetic epistemology, and the triumph of a method
Module 3: Kohlberg and friends
Module 4: Erikson, H. S. Sullivan, and the psychodynamics of the life course
Module 5: The Neo-Piagetians
Module 6: Emotion and development
Module 7: Dynamic system models of the mind
Module 8: Explicating the Common Core metric
Module 9: Learning sequences and educational research
Module 10: Transforming K-12 education through assessment reform
Module 11: The assessment and promotion of adult learning
Module 12: Pragmatizing the research results
FOLA has been fuel and inspiration and energy that I've really been able to share with others and refine my practice as I go. There's more depth of understanding now and a lot more humility. —Senior consultant
James Mark Baldwin was the first to develop a theory of development and how it influences people's perceptions, views, behavior, and learning. His work represents some of the earliest and most sophisticated theorizing about development. Engaging with Baldwin provides insights into the history of methods in developmental psychology and the value of a bio-psycho-social approach in research and education.
To discover and explore many of the core themes of this course in the work of one of the field’s earliest and most creative theorists.
This module explores the work of Jean Piaget, who picked up where Baldwin left off, offering research studies and theoretical models addressing a wide range of basic issues in developmental psychology. Piaget (along with his many collaborators, including Barbel Inhelder and Eleanor Duckworth) surpassed Baldwin in revealing the relations between developmental level and various aspects of thought and action, and inspired a whole generation of educators to begin adopting a developmental approach to pedagogy. A close, although brief, look at Piaget provides insight into the history of developmental methods and the importance of approaches to research and assessment that allow individuals to demonstrate how they build knowledge. Piaget’s continued commitment to a bio-psycho-social approach also serves as a reminder that development is a complex process in which both culture and biology play a role.
To understand the basic insights that follow from Piaget’s work, especially as they form the backdrop for the continued legacy of constructivist approaches to education and research.
Please ensure that you read the specified version.
As a parent, I need to say that this work is urgently needed, especially the role CLAS can play in supporting more optimal learning and identifying learning difficulties. —Parent and developmental researcher
This module focuses primarily on the work of Lawrence Kohlberg, who applied Piaget’s broad theoretical and methodological commitments to the domain of moral reasoning. We use Kohlberg’s work to begin considering the difference between domain-specific and domain-general developmental systems, with an emphasis on how different approaches to modeling and measuring development affect educational practice and design. We also discuss the work of Kohlberg's students, including Cheryl Armon, Carol Gilligan, and Elliot Turiel, who have carried forward the study of moral development in recent decades.
To consider Kohlberg’s work as both a fruition and a transformation of Piagetian methods, representing an important turn in developmental psychology toward practice, education, and reform.
Kohlberg, L. (1975). The cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 56(10), 670-677.
Kohlberg, L. and D. Candee (1984). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (pp. 7-169). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The relationship of moral judgment to moral action. Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. W. Kurtines and J. Gewirtz. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 52-73.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). From is to ought: how to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In Essays on moral development: Vol. 1. The philosophy of moral development (pp. 101-190). New York: Harper and Row.
Habermas, J. (1990). Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage 6. In E. W. Thomas (Ed.), The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences (pp. 224-255). Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Armon, C. & Dawson, T. (1997). Developmental trajectories in moral reasoning across the lifespan. Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 26, No. 4.
Selman, R. L. (1971). The relation of role taking to the development of moral judgment in children. Child Development, 42(1), 79-91.
Walker, Lawrence J., & Taylor, John H. (1991). Family interactions and the development of moral reasoning. Child Development, 62(2), 264-283.
This module focuses on the work of Erik Erikson, Harry Stack Sullivan and other theorists, such as Anna Freud, who combined developmental models with insights from the psychoanalytic tradition. Erikson and Sullivan present comparable stage models and allow us to explore how their ideas about stages and developmental processes differ from those outlined by Piaget and Kohlberg. We will also explore important issues concerning the unique methods and applications that stem from these integrative models of the life course. We also discuss the work of more contemporary ego-development researchers, such as Jane Loevinger, Abraham Maslow, and Susanne Cook-Greuter.
To consider the work of Erikson and Sullivan in relation to Piaget and Kohlberg, and to explore their respective methodological and theoretical differences and similarities.
This has been such a treat. It has been a year of developmental delight, very delightful. It's meant a lot for me and my research. I think the biggest thing was finding developmental thinkers I hadn't even heard of before, especially Robbie Case. I also look forward to deepening the connections I've made here. It's been a deeply valuable experience. —Cultural development researcher
In this module, we consider the work of the Neo-Piagetians, including Kurt Fischer, Juan Pascual-Leone, Sharon Griffin, John Flavell, and Robbie Case. The Neo-Piagetians, like Kohlberg, followed Piaget, but they more explicitly continued Piaget’s search for domain-general models, mechanisms, and measures. These theorists teach us a great deal about the effects of context on development and transformation, such as why support and scaffolding are part of a person’s capacity (not separate independent influences), and why variability in performance is the norm, not the exception. We will also gain an initial understanding of the non-linear dynamics of the transitional phases between developmental levels.
To consider the key advances and revisions to the constructivist legacy undertaken by the Neo-Piagetians, and the implications for education and human transformation these imply.
In this module, we consider research and theorizing about emotion by focusing on the work of Donald Hebb and other more contemporary emotion researchers like Antonio Damasio and Mary Helen Immordino-Yang. The Skill Theory framework is used to integrate these approaches to understanding the relation between emotion and development. We explore the implications of understanding emotions in this way, for developmental processes, education, and research.
To consider the centrality and ubiquity of emotional processes in learning and development and explore a variety of theoretical approaches to understanding emotional development.
Hebb, D. O. (1946). On the nature of fear. Psychological Review 53, 259-276.
Fischer, K. W., Shaver, P., & Carnochan, P. (1990) (2006). How emotions develop and how they organize development. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 81-127.
Fischer, K. W. and Bidell, T.R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In W. Damon and R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 313-399). New York, Wiley. [pp. 314-336; 370-382].
Ayoub, C. C., Rogosh, F., Toth, S. L., O’Connor, E., Cicchetti, D., Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G., et al. (2006). Cognitive and emotional differences in young maltreated children: A translational application of dynamic skill theory. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 670-706.
Li, Jin, Wang, Lianqin, & Fischer, Kurt W. (2004). The organisation of Chinese shame concepts. Cognition and Emotion, 18(6), 767-797.
Immordino-Yang, M.H., McColl, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. (2009). Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. PNAS.106(19) 8021-8026.
Everything I learned in this course pretty much points me to the reality that developmental science is in process of being refined and developed as we speak. Many of the popular current models leave the impression that there is no further work to be done. —Senior development-focused consultant
In this module, we explore how dynamic systems modeling can be used to understand the development of cognition, skill, and emotion. We consider the importance of dynamic systems research in general by first looking at the work of early pioneers, such as Donella Meadows and Jay Forester. We then use the work of Paul Van Geert to provide an accessible introduction to dynamic systems models in developmental psychology and raise a set of critical concepts and questions. Next, we examine how Rose and Fischer approach the creation of a truly dynamic science of the individual. Finally, we explore the far-reaching implications of reframing human development in these terms.
To consider how dynamic systems models are being used in developmental psychology, and how this way of researching and explaining human development grows naturally out of the tradition we have been exploring.
This module examines a recent advance that builds on the history outlined in Part 1—Dr. Dawson’s domain-general cognitive developmental scoring system, the Lectical Assessment System (LAS). By exploring the LAS and the Lectical Scale to which it is calibrated, we'll deepen our exploration of the distinctions between domain-general and domain-specific developmental systems. We will also continue to advance our understanding of the non-linear dynamics of the transitional phases between developmental levels, paying special attention to the implications for measurement and pedagogy. This look at Dawson’s work also contributes to our continued exploration of the history of developmental assessment systems and methods.
To learn about the development and refinement of the Lectical Assessment System, as it relates to the history and future of developmental psychology and education.
FOLA has been lovely and validating. I've particularly liked the model of FOLA as a respectful conversation place where we agree to disagree. You get a good poke in the brain, which is always good for the soul. It's just the restoration of your faith and humanity that you need on a regular basis. —Leading educational expert
In this module we focus on the methods that accompany the Lectical Assessment System when it is used in the context of educational research—an approach known as Developmental Maieutics. We will examine two sets of learning sequences produced with Developmental Maieutics, one for physical science concepts and another for leadership decision making. We will discuss domain specificity, knowledge transfer, and the difference between within-level elaboration and between-level transformation.
To build an appreciation of the radical new possibilities opened up by recent advances in modeling and measuring human development, the way in which these advances might contribute to research and reform in education, and how they are continuous with the legacy of Baldwin, Piaget, and the Neo-Piagetians.
In this module, we consider the state of K-12 education in light of what we have learned in Parts 1 & 2. We will examine DiscoTests, which were Lectica’s original K-12 assessments. We consider how the right tests can help shape institutional cultures to promote optimal development and appropriate educational practice.
To consider the educational importance of the constructivist legacy for educational reform today, especially in testing.
In this module, we invite you to consider the state of adult education and learning in light of the material covered in Parts 1 & 2. As you take in the lecture and readings for this module, reflect upon prior teaching points concerning the nature of human transformation, including the non-linear dynamics of the transitional phases between developmental levels, the within-level prerequisites that set the stage for healthy transformation, and the ways in which culture and context shape the behavior and developmental trajectories of individuals.
To use adult learning as a context for integrating the many lessons about human development discussed in the course.
In this module, Dr. Dawson will…
Registration in FOLA gives you unlimited personal access to FOLA materials for as long as the series is offered. All amounts are in US dollars. There are no refunds after FOLA course materials have been released.
Our first aim in FOLA is to help participants gain a usable understanding of developmental theory and research. Consequently, we've designed the course to foster optimal learning—the kind of learning you can put to work in the world. For example, our flipped classroom design allows us to spend our time together exploring what we've learned from recordings and readings and relating what we've learned to our work and lives. MindLog provides additional support for growth through reflective writing (15–20 minutes per week), reflection sharing, and micro-goal setting. MindLog will also show you how your mind is growing as a consequence of participation.
Our second goal in FOLA is to bring together a strong group of academics and practitioners whose perspectives will enliven discussions around the ideas in FOLA recordings and readings. The heart of the FOLA experience is in the quality of our monthly discussions. These meetings work best when participants are fully prepared and able to interact respectfully during sometimes intense discussions. Individuals who clearly aren't preparing for meetings or fail to engage respectfully may be asked to leave the course.
The minimum time commitment for our Year of Developmental Delight includes 1 hour of listening, about an hour of writing, up to 3 hours of reading, 1 hour reviewing MindLog reflections, and 2 hours of meeting time each month. That's 9 hours per month, or about 2 hours per week. If you opt to listen to the recordings from the first Year of Developmental Delight, that will add another 2 hours per month.
To apply for FOLA, please fill in the relevant form, below.
IES (US Department of Education)
The Spencer Foundation
NIH
Dr. Sharon Solloway
The Simpson Foundation
The Leopold Foundation
Glastonbury School District, CT
The Ross School
Rainbow Community School
The Study School
Long Trail School
The US Naval Academy
The City of Edmonton, Alberta
The US Federal Government
Antonio Battro, MD, Ph.D., One Laptop Per Child
Marc Schwartz, Ph.D. and former high school teacher, University of Texas at Arlington
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, Ed.D., University of Southern California
Willis Overton, Ph.D., Temple University, Emeritus